South Africa's new merger notification thresholds: Key considerations
South Africa's new merger notification thresholds: Key considerations
May 11, 2026
South Africa
South Africa
South Africa
The Department of Trade, Industry, and Competition ("DTIC") has implemented new merger notification thresholds which determine whether a merger is classified as 'small', 'intermediate', or 'large', and has increased its filing fees.
In terms of section 13A(1) of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, the Competition Commission (the “Commission”) must be notified of mergers qualifying as intermediate or large. Section 13A(3) stipulates that parties may not implement an intermediate or large merger until it has been approved by the Commission.
Small mergers are generally exempt from mandatory notification requirements. However, parties should note that the Commission retains the authority to request notification within six months following implementation where it considers that the merger may substantially lessen competition or cannot be justified on public interest grounds.
The current thresholds and filing fees for intermediate and large mergers, compared to the previous thresholds, are set out below:
Category
Current
Previous
Intermediate mergers
Target firm asset value or turnover (incl. controlled firms)
R200 million
R100 million
Combined asset value or turnover (target + acquiring group, incl. controlled firms)
R1 billion
R600 million
Large mergers
Target firm asset value or turnover (incl. controlled firms)
R280 million
R190 million
Combined asset value or turnover (target + acquiring group, incl. controlled firms)
R9.5 billion
R6.6 billion
Category
Current filing fees
Previous filing fees
Intermediate mergers
R220,000.00
R165,000.00
Large mergers
R735,000.00
R550,000.00
Rationale for the Revised Thresholds
The previous merger notification thresholds were last revised in 2017. In the intervening period, inflationary pressures have resulted in numerous transactions exceeding the notification thresholds despite presenting no substantive competitive concerns. This has given rise to several difficulties:
Extended timelines: Merging parties have experienced prolonged waiting periods for merger approval;
Increased costs: Merger filing fees and the expenses associated with regulatory investigations have imposed a significant financial burden on merging parties; and
Administrative burden: The Commission and Competition Tribunal have been required to allocate considerable time and resources to reviewing transactions that may not have warranted such particular scrutiny.
The DTIC has recognised that updating the thresholds will benefit businesses, regulators, and the broader economy.
The increased thresholds mean that a fair number of transactions will now fall into the 'small' merger category and will not require notification. For merging parties, this has several benefits:
Expedited timelines: There is now no requirement to wait for regulatory approval for these small mergers;
Reduced costs: No merger filing fees or the associated legal fees with a merger filing are payable; and
Operational flexibility: Merging parties are now able to proceed with integration planning and implementation, without the need to wait for Competition regulatory approvals.
Certain transactions that would have previously qualified as large mergers (requiring Competition Tribunal approval) are now reclassified as intermediate mergers, which is reviewed by the Commission alone. This will result in expedited approval processes and a reduced administrative burden for the Competition Tribunal.
Implications for the Market
These amendments are expected to have a positive impact on the South African market:
Increased M&A activity: The higher thresholds reduce regulatory hurdles for transactions, which will further incentivise parties to engage in mergers and acquisitions;
Investor confidence: Foreign investors seeking to enter the South African market, will be more inclined to engage in acquisitions in South Africa;
Improved regulatory focus: With fewer routine transactions coming under review, the Commission and Competition Tribunal are better placed to concentrate their resources on larger transactions that may have an impact on the economy, as well as freeing capacity to undertake investigations into alleged anti-competitive conduct; and
Economic benefits: A more efficient merger approval process generates economic growth and employment.
It should be noted that the Method for Calculation set out in Part B of the General Notice 1254 of 2017 (Government Notice No. 41245 of 10 November 2017) remains unchanged.
The materials on the Eversheds Sutherland website are for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. While reasonable care is taken to ensure accuracy, the materials may not reflect the most current legal developments. Eversheds Sutherland disclaims liability for actions taken based on the materials. Always consult a qualified lawyer for specific legal matters. To view the full disclaimer, see our Terms and Conditions or Disclaimer section in the footer.